Glamour Flower review

Glamour Flower review | Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews
MrPinks.com review date - 02/27/2014

Overview:
"We are the only one and first site on the Internet that presents art nude teens in stockings. Our girls are like candies covered in sexy stockings. Do you like candies?" Glamour Flower might be a inflating its uniqueness a tad, but hey, I like candies! Don't you? A European production (if you couldn't tell from the shaky English), Glamour Flower does indeed showcase the breathtaking beauty of the continent's youthful women. Posing in and slipping out of seductive outfits made of lace, cotton, leather, nylon and whatever else master lingerie and hosiery craftsmen use to create their goods, Glamour Flower's debutantes entice you inside for a closer, more intimate glance at their blossoming sexualities. Charging for membership on a tiered pricing system ranging from "Rich" to "Poor" subscriber designations, the approach here seems refreshingly open and, dare I say, libertine. Why don't we all dive in for a much, much closer and much, much sexier look at Europe's newest generation and erection-inspirers.

Pros:
Stocking fetishism is hardly as rare as the folks behind Glamour Flower claim it to be, but it is a hard niche to nail. Glamour Flower keeps things simple with softcore galleries (and a few videos) showing gorgeous young European women posing in stockings, hose, tights, panties, thongs, corsets, bodysuits, and undergarments galore.

The stunning, very charming young European women appearing in Glamour Flower's galleries and scenes - and appearing dressed in sultry lingerie and slinky hosiery, I remind you - are almost uniformly slim, slender, and so very sexy. From statuesque blondes and redheads-next-door to dark-eyed brunettes and even a few wild girls with loudly artificial coloring, there's all types and styles here.

Galleries deliver images in three resolutions for online viewing. All pics look good at 640, 1024, and 5616px resolutions. Images are crisp and clear, vibrant with color, and aren't obscured by oversized watermarks. All in all, good shit, bro! Videos perform slightly poorer and ring in at a 720x576p resolution in a downloadable AVI file.

With a tiered pricing system that allows less financially secure folks to become members, Glamour Flower is that rare porn site with something of an honor system. Whether taking "The Rich" option at $49, the "Standard Price" plan at $39, or taking the "Student / Poor" route for a mere $18.99, you'll have found an option that suits your budget, I'm sure. (Or pretended to be enrolled.)

Cons:
In a move that's just as likely to infuriate and annoy as it is convenience, Glamour Flower's main update listing includes those updates yet to be made. Emblazoned with a small banner noting their impending date of arrival, these preview listings could be seen as clutter in the one place that should remain clutter-free.

Although a "Zip" link appears on all gallery pages, it leads not to a downloadable file but to a page explaining why the webmasters feel that adding zipped galleries would make it far too easy for pirates to freely redistribute the product of their hard work and investment. Sure, I understand that some might see things this way, but when all images can be manually saved, it'll merely make saving the pics harder for members.

Videos are clearly a secondary concern at Glamour Flower, The site's archive holds almost seven times the galleries than it does videos, leaving video fans with little to enjoy. The videos that are online are also lacking the visual potency of the photo galleries and have not yet hit HD standards.

While the young models are very beautiful and enticing, and while their underwear and hosiery amplifies the effect, there's really nothing at Glamour Flower that can't be seen in basically the same format elsewhere on the 'net. The webmasters might claim otherwise, but this site isn't totally unique, nor is it very plentiful with only 133 galleries and just 20 videos.

Conclusion:
Taking pretty European girls, dressing them in the finest lingerie and hosiery, and shooting them as they disrobe is an artistic or professional calling that has been around since the birth of said garments, so why does Glamour Flower claim to be so exceptional as to be the only site of its kind of the 'net? Far from being true, this is arguably not as important as what's held inside the site; or, more accurately, what isn't. Videos may be online, but they're delivered in shoddy low-res containers. Navigation tools are fairly basic and don't provide enough avenues of inquiry. The main focus of the site, though, the photo galleries look good, but are devoid of downloadable zip options. (A webmaster's explanation why will provide little comfort to photo fans.) The best thing Glamour Flower has going for it (besides the obviously charming and comely models, of course) is its pricing plan, where everyone (as far as anyone else knows) is a poor struggling student living on wheat crackers and Shasta, hoping for some affordable porn to come along and save his life. Hallelujah.