Reality Kings review

Reality Kings review | Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews
MrPinks.com review date - 01/09/2012

Overview:
From its inauspicious beginnings on January of 2000, Reality Kings has only been gaining strength and growing its roster of devoted members. Now in the era of HD video, instant gratification, and truly mobile media, it once again comes time to examine what makes this 39-site conglomerate rules its roost at the top of the online pornographic food chain. One glance at the tour pages and it's beginning to become clear: High Definition videos, the Monster Curves of today's top pornstars, mature MILFs and lascivious lesbians, ebony honeys with phat asses, Latina lovers, European cocksuckers, hyper-orgasmic squirting babes, street-walking amateurs, deep punishing anal sex, bizarre antics, massive undulating racks, 18-year-old shy girls, anxious first-timers, prissy little nightclubbing girls, and, of course, a huge collection daily updated with fresh new content that'll blow you away at every visit. Reality Kings isn't just a porn network, friends, it's a way of life. Joining in will cost you $24.95 a month, and with an incredible 39 sites to devour, that seems like a very small price to pay for what could very well be the greatest adult entertainment expenditure of your life. It might not reflect your current reality exactly, but with Reality Kings' influence, your reality can easily be changed into one you've always dreamed of.

Pros:
One of the largest porn networks on the 'net, Reality Kings is host to a staggering 6,897-scene collection of exclusive, original scenes spread across an amazing 39 websites, most of them adding new content on a weekly basis. From classics MILF Hunter, Cum Fiesta, Big Tits Round Asses, and First Time Auditions to newer RK efforts Pure 18, Money Talks, Hot Bush, and No Faces, there's plenty of variety and a ton of porn here, ready for your eager eyes.

When you're on a network hosting 39 websites, you expect plenty of updates and in that regard Reality Kings absolutely satisfies. New scene and gallery packaged hit the homepage anywhere from two to six times a day (depending on the week) and keep you and your hard-on very busy indeed.

What an astounding roster of talent available here at Reality Kings. Depending on the site you're viewing, you'll either get mostly amateurs or mostly professional pornstars, but all seem to perform very well and are photographed in a flattering, yet realistic fashion. Everyone from A-listers Alexis Texas, Sasha Grey, Lexi Belle, Bobbi Starr and Asa Akira, to newcomers Tessa Lane and Paige Turnah, and some of the most gobsmackingly gorgeous amateur girls are featured here, often in some of their best scenes.

With a thoroughly impressive array of formats available to suit all viewing platforms, most Reality Kings video now peak at vibrant, dynamic High Definition resolutions of 1920x1080 pixels, the equivalent of a retail blu-ray release. Whether streamed or downloaded the videos look fantastic with ample detail and plenty of colorful activity.

Although a Reality Kings membership is usually a pretty sweet deal at $24.95 a month, Mr. Pink has made it even sweeter by snagging his readers a discount that brings the monthly cost down to a low, low, super-low $17.95. You don't find value for money that good every day, folks!

Cons:
Every member of Reality Kings is restricted by a download cap of 10GB per 24 hour period. Download limits are always a drag, but even more so when you could easily hit 10 GB by grabbing a virtual handful of 1080p HD videos from any number of RK sites without even really scratching the surface of what's available. Hey, Reality "Kings", time for a bigger bandwidth allocation, don't ya think?

There are so many advertising graphics plastered around the Reality Kings network you'll feel like you're in an Internet version of that Josie & The Pussycats movie, just with more anal sex - onscreen anyway; sorry Alan Cumming - and less social commentary, and absolutely no songs written by any members of Fountains of Wayne, The Go-Go's, or The Grays.

Some of Reality Kings' websites fail to update on a weekly basis, instead preferring to add content once every two, three, or four weeks. (Details on which sites update when can be found on the network site directory page). A few other sites update whenever they hell they please and some, well, some don't even update at all anymore.

Unlike the brilliant video content online here at Reality Kings, the photo galleries are filled with images reaching resolutions no higher than a rather paltry 900px. Yes, they can be viewed online or downloaded in zipped archives, but these images quite simply lack the high resolutions today's discerning porn consumer requires; we can only hope an upgrade comes along soon.

Conclusion:
Like Tom Cruise before his couch-jumping days, Reality Kings seems to have All the Right Moves.* Ever since the RK team upgraded their video formats to gorgeous High Definition peaks of 1080p resolution, things have been looking better than ever on most of the network's 39 unique, original, and exclusive websites. From MILF Hunter and Captain Stabbin' to Hot Bush and We Live Together, there's an absolute shit-ton of fantastic content available here, bringing you everything from lesbian amateurs to assfucked professional pornstars and even three-breasted women on the hunt for a three-armed man. With a solid amount of racial diversity and hardcore variety, these 39 sites will definitely have something for almost everyone. Updates are, as stated, arriving multiple times every day and keeping the already enormous archive growing. As this incredible network races into its twelfth year and you still sit there unsatisfied with what your preferred networks of old have been offering of late, why not check yourself before you wriggity-wreck yourself, and pony up the meagre $17.95 required for a Mr. Pink's-approved monthly pass to the highly lauded and deserving Reality Kings network. I mean, really, you owe it to yourself, don't you think?

* I liked that joke from the previous RK review so much that I repeated it here; either I'm a lot funnier than I thought I was (not likely) or I've just got incredibly low standards. You, dear reader, have my sincere apologies if it in fact proves to be the latter.